A Denver choose this week dismissed a lawsuit filed by Douglas County — and supported by 5 different Colorado counties — that challenged state legal guidelines limiting native regulation enforcement cooperation with federal authorities on immigration issues.
Denver District Choose David Goldberg concluded in a ruling issued Monday that Douglas County didn’t have standing to carry the motion towards the state.
The ruling comes after the problem of unlawful immigration performed a key position in shaping final month’s presidential election, which can end in former President Donald Trump’s return to the White Home in January. Lowering unlawful crossings and deporting people who find themselves in the USA with out authorization have been key planks in Trump’s marketing campaign platform.
After Denver Mayor Mike Johnston mentioned town would resist any mass deportation efforts, the City Council in Fortress Rock — Douglas County’s seat — declared earlier this month that it might assist “any and all” immigration actions by the Trump administration.
Immigration has affected Colorado strongly, with greater than 40,000 migrants arriving in Denver over the past two years. Final month, the Frequent Sense Institute issued a report estimating that Denver, together with regional training and healthcare organizations, have spent $356 million on migrant response — or roughly $7,900 per migrant — since late 2022.
Douglas County Commissioner George Teal on Tuesday vowed the county would take its case to the federal courts. He mentioned “the choose acquired it mistaken.”
The county’s swimsuit, filed in April, focused two payments — one from 2019 and the opposite from final 12 months — handed by the Democratic-led Colorado Basic Meeting and signed into regulation by Gov. Jared Polis.
Home Invoice 19-1124 prohibited police and sheriff’s deputies from holding undocumented immigrants solely in response to detainer requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. And Home Invoice 23-1100 additional prevented state and native governments from getting into or renewing contracts with federal immigration authorities to detain individuals suspected of civil immigration violations.
Douglas County, which named Polis as a defendant within the swimsuit, claimed that the legal guidelines trampled on native governments’ potential to cooperate or contract “with each other or with the federal government of the USA,” as assured by the Colorado Structure’s Article 14.
The grievance particularly alleged that the laws violated the “distribution of powers” provision within the state structure.
However in his ruling, Goldberg wrote that the regulation “is silent as as to whether the Basic Meeting might place any boundary on a political subdivision’s proper to cooperate or contract with the federal authorities.”
“As such, Plaintiffs didn’t endure an harm in reality to a legally protected curiosity … as a result of the Colorado Structure grants the Basic Meeting the authority to promulgate legal guidelines, reminiscent of HB 19-1124 and HB 23-1100, that dictate the manners during which a political subdivision might cooperate or contract with federal governmental entities.”
The choose additionally famous that as a result of the federal authorities might not mandate {that a} state adjust to a federal civil immigration detainer request, the “defendant is free to find out the extent, if in any respect, the state will adjust to civil immigration detainer requests and whether or not the state will enter into or renew immigration detainment agreements.”
Teal argued the choose’s ruling made no sense. The county sheriff’s deputies cooperate with federal authorities on U.S. Forest Service land in relation to poaching, he mentioned, and with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Company in relation to cracking drug instances.
“That is the one space of public security that we’re barred from using public federal security assets,” Teal mentioned. “We’re taxpayers and we’re funding ICE, but we can’t entry that service as a group of taxpayers.”
Douglas County’s lawsuit was supported by El Paso, Mesa, Rio Blanco, Elbert and Garfield counties. Their hardline opposition to so-called sanctuary insurance policies in relation to migrants contrasts sharply with that of Denver, which has offered housing and different companies to individuals newly arrived from Venezuela and different international locations.
Johnston, a Democrat, generated blowback in Colorado and nationally in November along with his public feedback on immigration. He warned that any federal mass-deportation effort might be met with stiff resistance — together with a suggestion that he would mobilize the Denver Police Division to face off with federal and Nationwide Guard troops; he later walked again that remark.
Get extra Colorado information by signing up for our each day Your Morning Dozen electronic mail e-newsletter.
